|
|
|
UNITED PHOSPHORUS LTD |
|
AND |
|
SEARCH CHEM INDUSTRIES LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Phosphorus Limited (UPL) is the largest
producer in India of crop protection products |
|
Wide range of products that include fumigants,
fungicides, insecticides, rodenticides and herbicides. |
|
The
company ranks fourth amongst the generic agrochemical companies in the
world |
|
It is the world's largest producer of Aluminium
Phosphide, and Napropamide |
|
Through acquisitions, strategic alliances and
subsidiaries, UPL has built a network across the globe -- in Europe,
America, Asia Pacific, CIS, Africa and Australia |
|
Fully
owned subsidiaries in Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, China, Cuba,
Denmark, Honduras, HongKong, Japan, Mauritius, Mexico, Poland, Russia,
South Africa, USA, UK, Zambia, Zimbabwe and representative offices in Sri
Lanka & Vietnam. |
|
|
|
|
|
UPL has pursued a strategy of |
|
continuous expansion, |
|
backward and forward integration, |
|
branded product development, |
|
thrust on registration and aggressive marketing. |
|
UPL has been managing change and making most of
the opportunities that opened with liberalization and globalization. |
|
the driving forces of the company |
|
A focus on its core competence, |
|
a vision of being a global player and |
|
a commitment to provide cost effective quality
solutions in crop protection for farmers, |
|
Operates across seven manufacturing sites, six
in India and one in Europe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration is the core strength of UPL. |
|
This approach secures reliable raw materials for
multi-site manufacturing through an extensive downstream range of products
and services. |
|
UPL pioneered 'backward integration' in
agrochemicals and is one of the world's few companies to manufacture
complex organo-phosphorus compounds starting from the basic raw material,
rock phosphate ore |
|
as in
SCIL, a subsidiary of UPL |
|
|
|
|
|
Search Chem (SCIL) is a subsidiary of UPL. |
|
UPL owns about 53.1% of SCIL’s equity |
|
Its core focus lies in chlorine molecules and
Phosphorus based products. |
|
Runs a state of art, integrated Caustic Chlorine
and Value-added Specialty Chemical Complex at Jhagadia, Gujarat, India. |
|
Exports more than 20% of its total production. |
|
Incurred huge losses in the past. |
|
Presently on a turnaround path |
|
However, net worth substantially eroded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synergies between the operations of SCIL and UPL |
|
Income-tax advantage |
|
Overall value enhancement for shareholders of
both the companies |
|
SCIL has turnaround |
|
Consolidation based on independent valuation |
|
Interdependent financial operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale |
|
Integration of operations |
|
Enhanced financial strength and flexibility |
|
Cost efficiencies and savings in administration
costs |
|
Removal of transfer pricing issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UPL likely to have huge tax liability on back of
substantial profits |
|
Section 80HHC and 80IA benefit will cease by
2004 |
|
SCIL has huge tax losses of Rs. 219 crores (as
on March 31, 2002) |
|
Hence, tax losses of SCIL can be optimally
utilised by the consolidated entity |
|
Only MAT
payable till tax losses utilised |
|
|
|
|
|
SCIL has started turning around |
|
Loss for 2001- 2002 - Rs 50 cr |
|
Last quarter (December) SCIL posted a Net profit
of Rs 4.55 cr and cash profit of Rs 8.9 cr |
|
Expected to make a profit around Rs 7 crore for
2002-03 |
|
Financial operations of both companies
interdependent |
|
SCIL funded by UPL to the extent of Rs 300 cr |
|
External loans of SCIL guaranteed by UPL to the
extent of Rs.105 crores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse Demerger of the Manufacturing division
of UPL into SCIL |
|
Shareholders of UPL to receive shares in SCIL as
consideration |
|
SCIL to renamed as “UPL” to retain goodwill,
brand equity etc. |
|
Demerger to be implemented under a Scheme of
Arrangement under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 |
|
Scheme to require the approval of shareholders,
creditors, and the Gujarat High Court |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 72A of IT Act not required to be invoked in case of Reverse merger |
|
Hence conditions stipulated in Section 72A not
required to be complied with |
|
to hold
assets of SCIL for a period of 5 years |
|
to continue business of SCIL |
|
attain a particular level of capacity
utilisation |
|
Flexibility retained to divest SCIL’s operations
at a future date |
|
Without losing the benefit of tax losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appointed Date - March 1, 2003 |
|
Demerger of the Manufacturing Division of UPL
into SCIL |
|
Entitlement Ratio - 1:12 |
|
However, this will result in SCIL having a
bloated share capital |
|
The Remedy |
|
Capital Reduction of SCIL by 91.67% against
accumulated losses |
|
Resultant Swap ratio 1:1 |
|
Cancellation of Preference capital of SCIL held
by UPL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology used for UPL |
|
Net Asset Value method |
|
Profit Earning Capacity Value method |
|
Market value method |
|
Appropriate weights assigned to each method |
|
Discounting Cash Flow - used as a supporting approach |
|
Methodology used for SCIL |
|
Market price |
|
Fair to minority shareholders of SCIL |
|
Other methods not considered appropriate |
|
Swap ratio - 12 shares of SCIL for 1 share of
UPL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders to be given an exit option |
|
Such exit combined with the demerger through the
Preference Share route |
|
The scheme to provide for an option to issue
Preference shares in the merged entity to the equity shareholders of UPL |
|
14 preference shares of SCIL will be issued for
one equity share of UPL |
|
The
Preference shares will |
|
be redeemable after 3 years |
|
carry a coupon rate of 7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-demerger Pre |
|
UPL 7.56% 53.10% |
|
Other Promoters 35.41% 16.61% |
|
Public 25.75% 21.85% |
|
Institutions and others 31.28% 8.44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Equity ratio - 1.13:1 |
|
ROCE - 14.35% * |
|
RONW - 8.49%
** |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Share capital to be reduced to 8.33% |
|
Pre reduction - Rs 4561.83 lacs(fully paid-up) |
|
Post-reduction - Rs 380.00 lacs |
|
Shares to be issued to shareholders of UPL in
the ratio of 1:1 |
|
Shares issued - Rs 2547.46 lacs |
|
Post-demererger capital of SCIL - Rs 2927.46
lacs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name will change to ‘Uniphos Trading Limited’ |
|
Will continue |
|
to carry on its trading operations |
|
to hold investments (including equity shares in
SCIL) and Khar administrative office property |
|
Truncation of operations would lead to
truncation of Balance Sheet |
|
Capital Reduction of UPL to the extent of 80%
envisaged under the Scheme |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital to be reduced to 20% |
|
Pre reduction - Rs 2547.46 lacs |
|
Post-reduction - Rs 509.49 lacs |
|
Face value to be reduced to Rs 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder holds say 100 shares of UPL |
|
In UPL |
|
He will continue to hold 100 shares |
|
Face value reduced to Rs 2 (due to capital
reduction) |
|
In SCIL |
|
In case he exercises Preference share option |
|
He receives 1400 Preference shares of SCIL |
|
7% coupon rate (tax-free) |
|
redeemable on expiry of 3 years |
|
In case he exercises Equity share option |
|
He receives 100 equity shares of SCIL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder holds say 100 shares of SCIL |
|
In SCIL |
|
He will now hold 8 shares |
|
As capital being reduced to 8.33% |
|
In respect of the fractional entitlement of 0.33
shares |
|
All fractional entitlements to be consolidated
and held in Trust by a Director |
|
Shares to be sold at an opportune time and cash
to be distributed to the shareholder in proportion to his fractional
entitlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stamp Duty (Reasonable) |
|
Payable in Gujarat |
|
Stamp duty
payable at 0.75 % of higher
of the following: |
|
the value of shares issued by SCIL to the
shareholders of UPL; or |
|
Value of immovable property of UPL in Gujarat |
|
Tentative stamp duty estimate based on value of
shares issued - Rs 2.9 cr |
|
Sales Tax (NIL) |
|
No Sale as transfer of the undertaking of UPL as
a going concern |
|
Coromandal Fertilisers Limited v. State of A. P.
(112 STC 7) (A.P.) |
|
|
|